So I went up to the ESPNZone in Baltimore last night to go see poker pro/celebrity basher Phil Gordon. He gave a little lesson to 200 people on risks to take while playing Hold 'Em. It was a neat little lesson, and there was free food and beer, which always makes things better. And he did private Q&A as he walked around, so kudos to him.
I was also there in an attempt to win a WSOP 2006 seat, since they were giving one away to one of the people there. I didn't win anything, but it was worth a try. It was a $10,000 prize and you didn't have to play a single hand of poker; also Phil Gordon said for all the winners, he'd come visit them every day they were in the tournament and look at their stacks and their competition and give them personal advice on how to play. Neat.
Ooh, and the guy that came in 2nd in this year's WSOP was there, as he's from Severn. So good times.
And for anyone that plays poker with me already knows, apparantly I don't raise enough. I've made a note to be more of a asshole while we play :)
Posted by Rick at August 17, 2005 09:18 AMWe need to get another PA poker night soon.
Posted by: Nate at August 17, 2005 09:54 AMCan someone explain this poker craze to me? It didn't start until after I moved to Texas, so maybe I'm missing something by not playing it in the right crowds. Or maybe it's lacking excitement because I'm not betting in the thousands of dollars per hand like you see on T.V. But from what I've gathered from the way you guys play, you pretty much play each other all the time, so the money just kind of goes back and forth and everybody comes out about the same in the end. I mean, I've played a few nights of poker since I moved down here, and, well, it's just poker. If you're looking for an excuse to get together with people and drink, there're are plenty of other ways to do that. I've even watched poker a few times on T.V. The celebrity ones aren't too bad because of all the side conversations, but the poker itself is nothing special. I'm not trying to say that I don't enjoy playing poker, I just don't see what the huge draw is. What am I missing?
Posted by: Fatboy at August 17, 2005 10:36 AMPoker?
Posted by: Nate at August 17, 2005 10:48 AMI think it is a bit more of an intellectual exercise than I usually conduct while I am drinking. While it may not be chess or anything as esteemed, it is something of a puzzle that you try and figure out with variable pieces. And some of the pieces are your friends, which is fun.
Posted by: John at August 17, 2005 11:02 AMIt's something fun to do because it's a competitive activity that requires some strategic thinking. I think we all feel somewhat accomlished as long as we don't lose all of our money. If you win a few bucks, you congratulate yourself, and if you lose a few, you can always blame the cards :)
And yeah, no one's in it for the money. I don't think we even have regular winners despite playing regularly for a while now. And the way we look at it, if you lose a few bucks, you still had a few hours of conversation, a little excitement, and a lot of beer.
Posted by: Rick at August 17, 2005 11:27 AMHe's in it for the money!

It's kind of rare for us to see a pot go over $5, but still, we don't want to lose. The friendly competition is fun, the rush of flopping a flush is fun, trying to stifle yourself and hide all expression is fun, drinking is fun.
We enjoy the cards, we enjoy the hanging out, we enjoy the drinking. Plus, we all know when Mike has flopped a set of Queens.
Posted by: Chris at August 17, 2005 12:09 PMin line with others - i don't do it for the money. i don't play backgammon or rummikup for money, rather i think they, like poker, are fascinating games of skill and strategy. from a nerdy perspective, it's probability in action (little known fact: the origins of probability theory came are in gambling) and it's a social game, including drinking, joking, and all the emotions that go with both good and bad luck.
Posted by: roy at August 18, 2005 05:08 PM