I know on a few occassions we have attempted to figure out how the hell people play cricket. Wickets and bowlers and Rick's favorite - white pants. At one point we watched a couple hours of it, trying to decifer scoring and such. Anyway, it seems that an American Pro Cricket League now exists. 8 teams in different cities, and one of them in a DC team, playing in Bowie at Prince George's County Stadium. There is a game on Sunday at 1 (possibly the season finale). I will be asleep or drunk (or both), but just figured I would drop that on here. Check out the rosters, good luck pronouncing those names. $5 to anyone who buys a Garfield Wildman jersey.
Posted by Pat at July 30, 2004 10:59 AMC'mon, cricket's easy:
Law 9 (The bowling, popping and return creases)
1. The creases
A bowling crease, a popping crease and two return creases shall be marked in white, as set out in 2, 3 and 4 below, at each end of the pitch. See Appendix B.
2. The bowling crease
The bowling crease, which is the back edge of the crease marking, shall be the line through the centres of the three stumps at that end. It shall be 8ft 8 in/2.64m in length, with the stumps in the centre.
3. The popping crease
The popping crease, which is the back edge of the crease marking, shall be in front of and parallel to the bowling crease and shall be 4ft/1.22m from it. The popping crease shall be marked to a minimum of 6ft/1.83m on either side of the imaginary line joining the centres of the middle stumps and shall be considered to be unlimited in length.
4. The return creases
The return creases, which are the inside edges of the crease markings, shall be at right angles to the popping crease at a distance of 4ft 4 in/1.32m either side of the imaginary line joining the centres of the two middle stumps. Each return crease shall be marked from the popping crease to a minimum of 8ft/2.44m behind it and shall be considered to be unlimited in length.
Makes sense to me. From http://www.lords.org/cricket/laws.asp
Posted by: Chris at August 1, 2004 07:00 PMVery nice Chris, I just want to know why we couldn't have gotten www.lords.org, the e-mail addresses we'd have would be almost as good as mike@analrazors.com.
Posted by: Mike at August 2, 2004 09:34 AM